🔗 Share this article

An activist group has claimed to have harvested millions of tracks from the popular streaming service and is preparing to release them publicly.

Possible Boost for AI Training

Observers said the apparent data breach could boost AI companies searching for data to train their technology.

A group known as Anna’s Archive said it had scraped 86 million music files from the platform and 256 million entries of metadata such as artist and record names. Spotify, which carries more than 100 million songs, confirmed that the leak did not constitute its entire catalog.

“We have located and deactivated the nefarious user accounts that engaged in unlawful scraping,” said a Spotify representative.

The Swedish service, which has more than 700 million subscribers worldwide, further explained that an inquiry into unauthorised access identified a external actor scraped public metadata and used questionable tactics to bypass DRM protections.

Group's Declared Mission and Concerns

Spotify does not believe the music acquired by Anna’s Archive has been made public yet. Anna’s Archive, which is known for offering links to pirated books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘historical repository’ for music.

They asserted the music files accounted for 99.6% of all music listened to by its listeners and would be shared via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a method of exchanging large digital files online.

“Of course Spotify doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic beginning,” commented Anna’s Archive, which frames its purpose as “preserving humanity’s knowledge and culture”.

AI Training and Intellectual Property Battleground

Ed Newton-Rex for protecting artists’ rights, remarked the breached music would probably be utilized for training artificial intelligence systems.

“Educating models on illegally sourced material is sadly widespread in the AI industry, so this stolen music is almost certain to end up instructing AI models,” he stated.

The group's website makes references to a large online archive, a huge online archive of copyrighted books that has reportedly been leveraged by Meta to develop its systems.

The co-founder of an artificial intelligence company wrote on LinkedIn that individuals of the public could in principle “build their own personal free equivalent of Spotify”. He added it could also enable tech companies to “train on contemporary music at a large volume”.

Copyright has emerged as a key issue between creatives, authors and creatives on one side and AI companies on the other.

Government Considerations and Reactions

Across Britain, creative professionals have raised concerns against a government proposal to allow AI companies use copyright-protected work without permission unless the rights holder signals. Virtually every participant to a government consultation on the idea has supported artists’ apprehensions.

The secretary of state for technology, research and development informed parliament this month there was “little consensus” on the issue, adding that ministers would “take the time to get this right”. The government has pledged to make policy proposals on AI and copyright by next year.