🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold policy to ban social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves internationally. Officials, child protection groups, and guardians are watching intently to see if this strategy will set a precedent for other nations.

Across Europe Movement

Throughout Europe, a growing group of nations are moving toward comparable bans.

• The Danish government has announced a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the leader stating that mobile devices and platforms are "taking away our youngsters' innocence". Legislation is expected to be passed next year.
• Norway is set to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard young people from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• The Irish government is working on a digital ID system to confirm the user details of social media account holders. The media minister have indicated that an Australia-style ban could be "a potential measures in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the president has called on the legislature to enact a bill raising the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has endorsed a related action, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Netherlands has urged guardians to block their youngsters from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has adopted a symbolic motion supporting a ban for minors without parental consent is given. Although it cautions of the "addictive" quality of these apps, the move does not enact enforceable legislation.

"An effective age limit is a good first step," stated one MEP supporting the resolution.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Approach

For the United Kingdom, the administration has not ruled out a possible ban, arguing that "no measure is discarded" but maintaining any policy must be "based on strong data".

Earlier, interest gathered behind a legislative effort to introduce controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately weakened. Nonetheless, the administration committed to further research the issue.

Charities have voiced apprehensions. A prominent charity founded by the relatives of a young person who was lost after encountering disturbing platform posts argues that a simple age ban may not improve online safety and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of risk when users turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the inability of the social media companies to create platforms and apps that are safe and fit for children," commented a prominent child protection advocate.

America: A State-by-State Picture

Across America, legislation is primarily occurring at the regional level against a backdrop of national gridlock.

• The state of Utah demands guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a bill banning those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a rule limiting minors to a single hour of social media access per day, with any further time needing a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed measures requiring guardian approval for teenagers to create social media profiles.

Despite cross-party agreement and suggestions from certain politicians to copy the Australian path, a federal ban is currently seen as unlikely.

Global Perspectives

Beyond the West, further countries are likewise taking action.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has raised the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, global agencies take a more measured position. A major UN agency has warned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "could prove counterproductive". The agency notes that social networks can be a "lifeline" for isolated children and that bans should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to improve safety.

As this global conversation evolves, the actions of the Australian government and several other countries demonstrate that policymakers internationally are increasingly prepared to stand by for the industry to make changes on their own.